In this article, we will talk about an easy method to figure out whether you liked a literary work or not. It will help you to write a book review.
Easy Method to Estimate the Literary Work
It happens that your professor gave you a task to write an analysis of the book and you do not know what to write because you cannot understand if you liked the text or not. It is a common problem. Another situation is when the reviews are negative and you change your attitude due to the majority opinion. How to navigate in the ocean of subjective assessments? How to form your own opinion about the text? I want you to do my essay for me online writers want to help you and offer quite a simple method to figure out whether you like the literary work or not.
I Do Believe
The first point of your personal opinion is the author’s persuasiveness. Evaluate the text by the criterion “I believe – I do not believe.” Often it is hard to say it clearly, so if your impressions can be expressed as “I believe in general,” “I believe, except a couple of small details” or, finally, “I would rather believe,” then your choice is “Yes, I believe.” If you think something like: “No, I do not believe a single word!”, “I do not believe in general,” then your assessment is “No, I do not believe.”
Evaluate the text according to the general impression. This impression is one of the most important sensations of every reader and, of course, critic. Therefore, for an adequate evaluation of the text, you must definitely decide whether you believe it or not. That is why there is no neutral formulation in the rating scale, such as “I do not know,” “I believe in something, there is something in it.”
If the critic does not know whether he/she is believing the text or not, then it is not a good time to analyze it. Maybe he/she needs to re-read the work again, think about it, discuss it with friends, etc.
Similarly, it is necessary to assess the degree of originality of the text. Were you surprised? Did the author describe any original plot twists, thoughts, and feelings of the characters? Evaluate the text by the criterion “surprised – not surprised.” Also, we have the same situation with the absence of a neutral assessment.
Rate the text as a whole. Consider it as a cultural phenomenon, without analyzing genre affiliation, without addressing the perfection of design, compositional structure, characters’ images, and language expressiveness.
Square of Trust and Interest
So, let us sum up the previous steps. We got answers to two questions: “I believe – I do not believe” and “I was surprised – I was not surprised.” Graphically it can be reflected on paper as a table with four cells that have their own characteristics of trust and interest. Each text evaluated by these two criteria has a completely definite place in the table.
· First cell
Here you may put texts that evoke both trust and interest. About them you want to say “Yes, I believe” and “Yes, I was surprised” at the same time.
· Second cell
Here we have those texts that did not cause either trust or interest. These are the most pointless texts. Authors of texts that fall into this category, perhaps, can be advised to look for other ways of self-expression or to think about whether it is worth wasting time and efforts to improve the piece of writing.
· Third cell
Here we have texts that surprised us, presented the situation from an unexpected angle, but, at the same time, they did not evoke trust in themselves, they did not convince that this may happen, they created the impression of artificiality. Authors of such texts can be, for example, young people, who begin conquering the creative peaks. They definitely have talent, but they do not have enough life experience, literary skills, and wisdom to reflect the “truth of life” in the text. “Truth” is necessary even in the case when it comes to fiction.
· Fourth cell
In the last cell, there are texts, which reveal the truth of life, the characters look convincing, cause trust, the motives of the heroes are plausible, and the actions are logical. However, at the same time, the events described evoke no interest, they do not remain in memory. Characters do not cause a desire to compare you to them.
The Universal Criterion
It is time to formulate a universal criterion for the quality of a literary work. In order to be considered as a good literary work, the text should receive at least two positive answers to the questions:
- Do I believe it?
- Is it interesting?
- Is it well made? (This criterion is about structure, images, the concept of the text and so on.)
In practice, this means that all the analyzed texts can be divided into four groups. Moreover, the texts of the first two groups satisfy the universal criterion and, accordingly, can be classified as creative writing. And the texts of the third and fourth groups do not satisfy the criterion and do not belong to the category of art.
- Excellent text – three positive answers out of three possible.
- Good text – two positive answers out of three possible.
- Satisfactory – one positive answer of three possible. The text does not satisfy the universal criterion.
- Not satisfactory – three negative answers. The text does not belong to the number of literary phenomena.
This method helps not only estimate the text and understand whether it is a masterpiece or just graphomania but also allows you to outline the author’s work on the texts. The same applies to self-analysis. Look at your own pieces of writing from this point of view and you will understand what the text lacks in order to get an excellent mark. This method is not universal for all genres, it will come in handy when it comes to fiction and non-academic literature. However, it is a good way to understand your feelings about the book and give an objective opinion.